The video game industry is an ever apparent and visible field, but one is yet so elusive as to where to start or how one enters into the industry in the first place. Like a mirage in the desert of employment, it fades into the aether for most people.

Should you find the mythical door into a company, it pays to check who you’re getting into the metaphorical bed with. The following is a quick round-up of some of the bigger names in video games with data pulled from the job site, Glassdoor.

Best and Worst Gaming Companies to work for

Best and Worst Gaming Companies to work for

While this is meant to be as helpful as possible, all reviews should be taken with a grain of salt, and any one person’s experience can vary greatly from the next depending on a myriad of reasons and circumstances.

Activision Blizzard

activision blizzard

  • Rating: 3.6 out of 5 Stars
  • 58% Recommend to Friends – 53% CEO Approval
  • Pros: Great Talent Acquisition, Exciting Projects
  • Cons: Long Hours (10-12 hour days at times), Improper Work/Life Balance (exacerbated by Crunch)

In my personal opinion, it’s a bit worrying (but not wholly surprising) that one of if not the biggest publishers in video games have a fairly middle-of-the-road rating. I do sympathize with them to a certain extent as having many employees under your banner it’s nigh on impossible task to make sure everyone has a good experience, but at the same time, they certainly have the resources to ensure these things don’t happen.

Former employees cite having the pleasure of working with very friendly and talented colleagues at the company, for the big game titles like World of Warcraft that is constantly being updated, with the newest The Burning Crusade release where players are craving TBC Gold, other major games that are Starcraft, Hearthstone, Overwatch and more.

The cons mention financial compensation being lacking (in both salary and pension), a lack of creativity or the ability to be creative in your role, and the structure of the company hierarchy and the management within that set-up.

Rockstar Games


  • Rating: 4.3 out of 5 Stars
  • 86% Recommend to Friends – 99% CEO Approval
  • Pros: Good Work Environment, Great People
  • Cons: Long Hours with Very High Standard, W/L Balance Non-existent

Well, hot damn, everybody loves Sam Houser it seems.

There’s a reason Rockstar puts out the games it does at the frequency that it does with the individual quality that it does. The people working on those games must be working themselves to the bone for many, many grueling hours to get R*’s games to the level they aspire to, and it seems to show in their reviews.

While there’s definitely an element of “fame” as it were that comes with being able to put the company on your CV, the company (for the most part it seems anyway) to compensate its workers quite well, and the culture sounds (I stress sounds) like it’s in a better place than other Triple-A studios.

The negatives appear to be time management from higher-ups, resistance or the bureaucracy involved in implementing change, the lack of available individual growth, and in some offices instances of internal politics or favoritism. Crunch and the lengthy time spent at work is also a big concern for many.

Nintendo of America


  • Rating: 4.2 out of 5 Stars
  • 72% Recommend to Friends – 100% CEO Approval
  • Pros: Work/Life Balance “Unmatched”, Good Benefits for FT employees
  • Cons: Progression is dependant on being a “Brand Ambassador”

A full-house of thumbs up for Big N CEO Shuntaro Furukawa with a 100% approval rating. While it may be a far cry from the Nintendo of Europe or the HQ in Japan, Nintendo of America gets rave reviews from both past and current employees as being a fun and engaging place to work, with many people writing nothing or saying there are “no cons” to the company.

While somewhere like Rockstar has the element of a heavyweight title when it comes to putting the name onto your work history, Nintendo is more of a fanciful childhood dream job. Many gamers grew up playing titles from Nintendo that shaped who they are, and getting to work for them is almost a reward in itself.

Positives for Nintendo of America include a fun environment and company events, good healthcare, and getting to work with people who share a passion for video games.

The more in-depth reviews say the negatives include a very sluggish promotion tree (with some promotions taking multiple years to be acknowledged), no willingness to try new things, poor communications between teams, and little to no handling of project management.

Epic Games

Epic Games

  • Rating: 4.2 out of 5 Stars
  • 80% Recommend to Friends – 90% CEO Approval
  • Pros: Great People and Benefits, Free Food
  • Cons: Occasional Crunch, Mismatched W/L Balance

From the early days of Unreal Tournament and Jazz Jackrabbit to the Mount Olympus-Esque heights of every Gen Z’s favourite Battle Royale title Fortnite, Epic Games seems like it’s as good a place to be on the inside as it would seem to be from the outside looking in.

The pluses of working at Epic Games are that the studio is “best of both worlds” according to one review, with experienced heads at the helm and new generation talent having the tools in hand to lead the studio from one success to another. CEO Tim Sweeney is called a “visionary” in the same review and the company is cited as being “player-focused” with a good strategy.

The minuses on the other hand spawn from the chaos that ensues from working at such a big company that is juggling such a project. Without “bullet-proof task and project management skills”, it’s hard to stay on top of anything. It’s very much up to the individual to manage themselves, which often leads to the reported Crunch times.

Electronic Arts

Electronic Arts

  • Rating: 4.1 out of 5 Stars
  • 84% Recommend to Friends – 91% CEO Approval
  • Pros: Good Work/Life Balance, Friendly Working Environment
  • Cons: Long Hours, Lower Salaries compared with other companies

A quick scan of the reviews has the same complaints and praises popping up, with most notably the point about salaries not being up to scratch in certain areas/roles rearing its head in many people’s remarks.

The positives state that staff receives good benefits, the offices and workspaces are good, and contractors usually receive continuous work for a good amount of time (even spanning multiple years).

The negatives iterate on the lower than average pay grades, the inability to progress within the company, poor managers often hindering work, bad communication in areas, and one review cites how their “lad” culture can force women to have to “act like a man” to fit in and have to work twice as hard to be taken seriously.



  • Rating: 2.9 out of 5 Stars
  • 33% Recommend to Friends – 27% CEO Approval
  • Pros: A Gaming Environment, Friendly Working Environment
  • Cons: Minimum Wage, Poor Hour Contracts, Management

Now I’m in the UK, so I don’t bear the full brunt of how GameStop operates but from what I’ve read and heard, the English equivalent doesn’t seem to be quite as bad as the tales that have reached my ears.

The majority of reviews come from the people out on the front lines, namely the Sales Assistants, and it seems to be those positions that have the biggest and most frequent gripes. That said, it’s not all sunshine and rainbows for other members of management.

The good things about working there seem to be the people you get to work with, and the fact that you’re in the thick of the gaming retail world, which for many of us is a fun place to be.

The bad stuff according to Glassdoor feedback are long and sometimes tedious shifts coupled with a lacklustre pay grade, employee hours being inconsistent, and the apparent push from upper management onto store staff to hard sell items like loyalty cards and subscriptions.



  • Rating: 3.5 out of 5 Stars
  • 68% Recommend to Friends – 40% CEO Approval
  • Pros: Free Game Codes, Get Games Before Public Release
  • Cons: Long Hours, “No Attempt” of W/L Balance

I’ve heard this line spouted from a lot of companies around the industry, and frankly, it really grinds my gears. If I wasn’t self-censoring, I’d have very much used an expletive there to describe my feelings. Even though IGN is considered a grandfather of video game news, similar to OSRS in the video game industry with its OSRS Gold, IGN has its own flaws.

That rhetoric being something along the lines of “because you work with video games/in the video game industry that’s a huge perk”. While that is true for a lot of people, that’s no excuse to undercut employees on pay, drive people into the ground with deadlines, or abuse people’s passion for the field they’re in as a way of manipulating them in some form.

The main pro of IGN Entertainment is that it’s a fun place to work and you’re at the heart of video game news and media for a large majority of the internet. Working hours are also flexible for most and there are the new age-y perks like free food

The downside of the company is the nothing-to-write-home-about benefits, the chaos of working there with one employee stating it felt like “building the aeroplane while you’re flying it”, and the “lack of journalistic integrity” that states the company was paid to review The Last of Us Part II with a 10/10 score.

Best and Worst Gaming Companies to work for

Source link


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here