The Micron 4600 produces the best results we’ve seen to date for the 3DMark Storage Benchmark. It’s effectively tied with the T705, a drive that uses a different controller and older flash, so there are no compromises made for gaming to get the superior power efficiency the 4600 brings to the table. We’ll have to see if this changes once more DirectStorage titles are available, though we expect the 4600 to be fairly future-proof.
Trace Testing — PCMark 10 Storage Benchmark
PCMark 10 is a trace-based benchmark that uses a wide-ranging set of real-world traces from popular applications and everyday tasks to measure the performance of storage devices. The results are particularly useful when analyzing drives for their use as primary/boot storage devices and in work environments.
Image 1 of 3
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
Usually, but not always, the PCMark 10 Storage Benchmark results align with 3DMark Storage Benchmark. In the case of the 4600 things closely align, and the drive just barely edges past the T705. This is an extreme amount of performance even when compared to the fastest budget PCIe 5.0 SSDs like the MP700 Elite.
Transfer Rates — DiskBench
We use the DiskBench storage benchmarking tool to test file transfer performance with a custom, 50GB dataset. We write 31,227 files of various types, such as pictures, PDFs, and videos to the test drive, then make a copy of that data to a new folder, and follow up with a reading test of a newly-written 6.5GB zip file. This is a real world type workload that fits into the cache of most drives.
Image 1 of 3
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
The 4600 finally misses a beat and drops behind the T705 in DiskBench, although its read performance is still excellent. This is a hint that the 4600 and its hardware — the new flash, perhaps — can’t quite reach new heights with sustained writes, something we will explore in the related test below.
Console Testing — PlayStation 5 Transfers
The PlayStation 5 is capable of taking one additional PCIe 4.0 or faster SSD for extra game storage. While any 4.0 drive will technically work, Sony recommends drives that can deliver at least 5,500 MB/s of sequential read bandwidth for optimal performance. In our testing, PCIe 5.0 SSDs don’t bring much to the table and generally shouldn’t be used in the PS5, especially as they may require additional cooling. Check our Best PS5 SSDs
Our testing utilizes the PS5’s internal storage test and manual read/write tests with over 192GB of data both from and to the internal storage. Throttling is prevented where possible to see how each drive operates under ideal conditions. While game load times should not deviate much from drive to drive, our results can indicate which drives may be more responsive in long-term use.
Image 1 of 3
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
There’s not much point in paying a lot more for a PCIe 5.0 drive to put into a PS5, but the Micron 4600 doesn’t disappoint in terms of performance. It just edges past the fastest PCIe 4.0 drives that we’ve tested in the PS5 read speed test, and everything basically ends up tied in our more demanding transfer tests. Other bottlenecks prevent the truly faster SSDs from separating themselves from the pack when we’re running all the drives in a PS5.
Synthetic Testing — ATTO / CrystalDiskMark
ATTO and CrystalDiskMark (CDM) are free and easy-to-use storage benchmarking tools that SSD vendors commonly use to assign performance specifications to their products. Both of these tools give us insight into how each device handles different file sizes and at different queue depths for both sequential and random workloads.
Image 1 of 14
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
The excellent read performance we saw in DiskBench is reflected also in ATTO. The Micron 4600 is fast along almost the entire curve, and is notably better than the Phison-based T705 with larger block sizes. Write performance is also top notch. These results are supported by CrystalDiskMark, where sequential read and write performance is the highest we’ve seen, and at two different queue depths. QD1 is of particular interest as many file transfers are at a low queue depth, and there the 4600 is unchallenged.
When we look at the technical specifications for this new flash, in particular when compared to the previous generation from Micron, we can see that some effort was made to improve 4K read performance. This is supported by the CDM results, where the 4600 brings some of the best 4KB QD1 random read latency results we have ever seen. This is important, as that specific workload directly relates to the real-world “feel” of an SSD.
This will certainly make some enthusiasts sit up, even though the gains are not as significant as many would like — although that is more about the limitations of NAND flash technology when manufacturers are mostly scaling for density. WD’s new SN7100 wasn’t as fast in a lot of other workloads, but it boasts top-notch random QD1 performance, eclipsing even the PCIe 5.0 drives.
Official write specifications are only part of the performance picture. Most SSDs implement a write cache, which is a fast area of pseudo-SLC (single-bit) programmed flash that absorbs incoming data. Sustained write speeds can suffer tremendously once the workload spills outside of the cache and into the “native” TLC (three-bit) or QLC (four-bit) flash. Performance can suffer even more if the drive is forced to fold, which is the process of migrating data out of the cache in order to free up space for further incoming data.
We use Iometer to hammer the SSD with sequential writes for 30 minutes or more to measure both the size of the write cache and performance after the cache is saturated. We also monitor cache recovery via multiple idle rounds. This process shows the performance of the drive in various states as well as the steady state write performance.
Image 1 of 3
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
The 2TB 4600 writes at an average of almost 12.4 GB/s when writing in the single-bit SLC mode, which is extremely fast even for a high-end PCIe 5.0 SSD. It’s delivering faster results than the existing Phison-based drives like the T705, and this is not surprising. The controllers in both cases are at the edge of what the interface can manage, so it comes down to the flash. Micron’s new 276-Layer TLC flash on the 4600 is an optimized form of the older 232-Layer in the T705, so this enables a bit more headroom in that department.
On the other hand, the 4600’s TLC mode writing speed of 3.94 GB/s is less than the 4+ GB/s we get from the T705 and T500 and even less than the 4.45 GB/s of the Sabrent Rocket 5
Finally, once the 4600 is forced into moving data from the cache to the native flash it writes at around 1.8 GB/s. This is less than half the direct TLC performance and is also not unexpected as rewriting data comes with a significant penalty. While this performance level seems far from the lofty 14.5 GB/s listed maximum, it’s actually pretty decent as things go. This is as fast as, or faster than, the direct-to-TLC speeds of the best PCIe 3.0 SSDs, so even in its slowest state the 4600 can put up numbers that make older drives look slow in comparison.
Power Consumption and Temperature
We use the Quarch HD Programmable Power Module to gain a deeper understanding of power characteristics. Idle power consumption is an important aspect to consider, especially if you’re looking for a laptop upgrade as even the best ultrabooks
Some SSDs can consume watts of power at idle while better-suited ones sip just milliwatts. Average workload power consumption and max consumption are two other aspects of power consumption but performance-per-watt, or efficiency, is more important. A drive might consume more power during any given workload, but accomplishing a task faster allows the drive to drop into an idle state more quickly, ultimately saving energy.
For temperature recording we currently poll the drive’s primary composite sensor during testing with a ~22°C ambient. Our testing is rigorous enough to heat the drive to a realistic ceiling temperature.
The 4600 brings in great power efficiency numbers, too, in comparison to previous drives in its class like the T705. Idle power consumption — which we test in a desktop environment state for performance, rather than a low-power laptop environment — remains a sticking point for drives like this, but the 4600 does improve significantly over the Phison E26 drives. While the power efficiency of the 4600 doesn’t reach the levels of DRAM-less budget drives, it’s good enough that this drive doesn’t need any sort of ridiculous cooling.
We also have results showing that, if you want to run it in a PCIe 4.0 slot (or in PCIe 4.0 mode at least), it can do even better. The 4600, via SMART, only pulls about 13% less power at full load than the T705, but in some power states it’s rated as much as 50% lower. This equates to real power efficiency improvements under load.
Temperature results are also good, with a maximum reading of around 68°C under heavy load. This is well below any throttling point. While a bit warmer than our original T705 results, it’s important to put that into context — the T705 can come with a hefty heatsink while the 4600 sample is more modest and has no heatsink. We still recommend cooling any drive at this level of performance, but you have much more leeway with the 4600 and its SMI 2508 controller compared to the various Phison E26 drives.
Test Bench and Testing Notes
Swipe to scroll horizontally
We use an Alder Lake platform with most background applications such as indexing, Windows updates, and anti-virus disabled in the OS to reduce run-to-run variability. Each SSD is prefilled to 50% capacity and tested as a secondary device. Unless noted, we use active cooling for all SSDs.
Micron 4600 Bottom Line
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
The Micron 4600 is a breath of fresh air, living up to the high expectations we had after our SMI SM2508 E31T
Unfortunately for the Micron 4600, Samsung’s announcement of the 9100 Pro
For PCIe 5.0 drives, those based on the E31T like Corsair’s MP700 Elite will likely become very popular. This also applies to drives in the same class using competing hardware. The latest flash is very capable even with four-channel controllers that lack DRAM, so things are looking pretty good for anybody who is shying away from the power-hungry, high-end PCIe 5.0 SSDs. The MP700 Elite and drives like it will perform great in PCIe 4.0 systems, too, so it’s only a matter of time before less-capable 4.0 drives disappear from the scene. The flash industry itself remains a bit murky in terms of supply and demand, but it shouldn’t be difficult to find good drives at a reasonable price moving forward. It just might be a bit longer until drives like the Micron 4600 are readily available for the best of all worlds.
We do have some other retail SSDs using the SM2508 controller incoming, so stay tuned to see how those stack up.
MORE: Best SSDs
MORE: Best External SSDs
MORE: Best SSD for the Steam Deck
